Posters featuring paintings of Absolut vodka bottles labelled Warhol, Haring and Scharf underneath each one

The sticky relationship between club culture and brands

Nightlife holds a special allure for brands seeking cultural relevance. But is that a setup that artists and audiences want to be part of? We speak with author Andy Crysell about the commercialisation of club culture, and what it signals about the state of both dance music and culture marketing

Nightlife is in flux. Industrial factories became clubs, and clubs became flats, wiping away the last totems of industry. Storied venues are taking bookings not just from DJs and promoters but from brands staging events and conferences, in an attempt to diversify revenue. Younger, sober-curious generations are retreating indoors, by choice or by force. Ownership of cultural production has shifted towards a cluster of tech and promotion empires. The established clubs that outspent smaller spots are being eaten up themselves; Goliath has become David.

It’s a perfect storm for brands seeking cultural relevance. With the state failing to protect venues and artists, they can be both the saviours and profiteers of nightlife. The trouble is, not everyone wants them there. This is explored in Selling the Night, a new book by Andy Crysell, whose career has straddled the worlds of music and brands, from organising parties to writing for music magazines to establishing agencies Ramp and Crowd DNA.

After selling up, Crysell decided to document the history and future of the dance music scene by looking at its relationship with the creative industries (“club culture was a very good route into [a creative career] for people in the working classes”), as well as its increasingly contentious relationship with brands and advertisers.

Bright orange vintage Fiorucci poster featuring an image of a person with short hair wearing a leopard print dress
Top: Absolut adverts featuring artworks by Andy Warhol, Keith Haring and Kenny Scharf; Above: Fiorucci poster from 1982